![]() Require any program to offer a diversion program for those who receive a violation Provide a notice of violation, review, hearing, and appeals process for those in violation Specify that a violation of the speed law would be subject to civil penalties Give warning notices of violation during first 60 calendar days of the programĭevelop guidelines for processing and storing information How would AB 645 work?Īccording to the bill’s information, it would require a participating city or city and county to: West said if the program is successful in the pilot cities, the state will consider using the program all throughout California. “The point of this pilot program is to give us data on what worked, what didn’t work, and what could be improved.” After that, there will be a reassessment period,” West said. “The pilot program is for five years or until January 1, 2032. The pilot cities would include, according to the bill: “Once approved, that bill would authorize cities to use speed cameras on the first of January,” West said. ![]() Kerri West, a spokeswoman for Friedman’s office, said the next hearing for the bill will take place Tuesday. These cities would test the “Speed Safety Pilot Program” where drivers who are caught speeding by the cameras would receive an automatic ticket without ever talking to a police officer. You could get a speeding ticket without having been stopped if a bill making its way through the Legislature becomes law and launches a pilot program in cities across California.Īssembly Bill 645, introduced by Assemblymember Laura Friedman, D-Glendale, would create a new speed camera program in pilot cities including Los Angeles and San Francisco.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |